Friendly Links


PubMed
Or try searching using predefined terms:
Follow me on Twitter
Aromatase inhibitors improve endometriosis pain control
By Ingrid Grasmo
28 September 2009
Human Reproduction 2009; Advance online publication

MedWire News: The combination of letrozole with norethisterone acetate (NET) reduces endometriosis pain intensity to a greater extent than NET alone, but is associated with more side-effects and has a similar effect on recurrence of pain, show study results.

Simone Ferrero (University of Genoa, Italy) and colleagues performed a prospective study of 82 women with endometriosis pain after laparoscopy who did not want to undergo further surgery. Over a 6-month period, half of the patients received a combination of letrozole and NET (group L) and the remainder were treated with NET alone (group N).

Both treatments significantly reduced pain intensity but, at both the 3- and 6-month assessment, pain intensity was significantly lower in group L than in group N, with corresponding values of 1.9 and 1.5 versus 3.4 and 2.8 for chronic pelvic pain, and 2.2 and 1.7 versus 3.8 and 3.1 for deep dyspareunia using a 10-cm visual analogue scale.

After treatment cessation, symptoms recurred at the 6- and 12-month follow-up, with no significant difference in pain symptom intensity seen between the two groups.

Significantly more patients in group L than group N experienced at least one side effect (43.2 vs 18.4 percent). Furthermore, some of these side effects, such as joint pain and myalgia, were not experienced during treatment with NET alone.

“On the basis of these findings and considering the higher cost of the double-drug regimen, we believe that aromatase inhibitors should be administered only to patients who previously failed to respond to established therapies and refuse surgery,” conclude the authors.

MedWire (www.medwire-news.md) is an independent clinical news service provided by Current Medicine Group, a part of Springer Science+Business Media. © Current Medicine Group Ltd; 2009

Journal abstract

Comments
This article currently has no comments
Post a Comment

Please note, email address is required but not shown. Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been approved. Please see the disclaimer for more information